Michael Moore has been on a tour promoting his most recent film, which happens to be about capitalism. I realize he's too easy a target, but he's so contradictory and illogical even in one six and a half minute clip that I have to point it out.
At the 2:40 mark, he says, "[He has to make sure]...that the pie is divided fairly amongst the people and not just a few people get the majority of the loot while everybody else has to struggle for the crumbs."
This is a common argument that I'm sure all of you have heard. People deserve a fair piece of the pie. FLG's first question is this: You're talking about dividing a pie. Yet, where did said pie come from? Did it magically show up at our doorstep? Did we steal it off the windowsill of some grandma? Where? Presumably, somebody baked the pie. Normally, we would say that the person that baked the pie gets to cut it up as they see fit. Perhaps grandpa helped peel the apples, so he gets a slice. Maybe she likes seeing her grandson smile, so he gets a piece. But apparently Michael Moore sees a pie and knows better than grandma. How often do you think grandma is going to bake pies if Michael Moore keeps coming in and telling her how to cut it up? Not very long, I reckon.
In reality, what we are talking about is capitalists and entrepreneurs who funded and built companies are grandma. Bill Gates is rich because he baked an awful lot of pies and kept pieces of each for himself. One really has to focus on the static situation, the present situation, a short-term analysis to talk about distributing a pie. No concern for where the pie came from, i.e. no concern about the past. No concern for where another pie will come from, i.e. no concern about the future.
This explains why at the 2:50 mark he says that capitalism has failed. Of course, if you look at the present crisis it looks like it has failed. But if you look at the last century or so. Shit. If you look at the last two decades just in China, the benefits of capitalism are indisputable. Sure, there are some problems. Inequality, environmental, etc. But hundreds of millions of people have been lifted out of poverty.
This could all be easily dismissed as just stupidity on Michael Moore's part, but at the 2:10 mark, he says, "Obviously, I do well because my films have done well."
Well, Bill Gates is rich because Microsoft has done well. In fact, Michael, your films are kinda like grandma baking a pie. You created something and receive the benefits for it. Seems kinda strange that you are morally righteous and have simply done well because what you created has done well. Yet, those other people, those rich people, are somehow morally repugnant because they did well because what they created did well.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

7 comments:
Has it ever occurred to anyone that Moore ought not be taken seriously - that Moore himself doesn’t take himself seriously? Our large adipose troll is a nothing more than a performance artist with one act – repeated ad nauseum. Also, he is a capitalist – note the subtitle of his movie. One will get you twenty that come nightfall, every night, he rolls naked in piles of money, laughing, laughing, laughing hysterically in a high pitched laugh.
Strange fact of the day: Moore was taught how to film documentaries by
Kevin Rafferty, one of the producers of The Atomic Café -- and George W. Bush's first cousin.
George, that would explain why he released Fahrenheit 9/11, a movie practically guaranteed to drum up sympathy for George W. Bush, right before the 2004 election.
I don't believe Bush owes his re-election to Michael Moore, but Moore certainly didn't hurt.
Andrew,
And neither will Moore hurt capitalism as anyone with an IQ over imbecile will note the dichotomy between his celluloid screeds and his living large.
How often do you think grandma is going to bake pies if Michael Moore keeps coming in and telling her how to cut it up? Not very long, I reckon.
This is why a guy with a truncheon must be stationed in the old lady's kitchen. (Oh, and he'll be wanting a slice too....)
Ann Althouse saw the movie an here is her review
"
The most striking thing in the movie was the religion. I think Moore is seriously motivated by Christianity. He says he is (and has been since he was a boy). And he presented various priests, Biblical quotations, and movie footage from "Jesus of Nazareth" to make the argument that Christianity requires socialism. With this theme, I found it unsettling that in attacking the banking system, Moore presented quite a parade of Jewish names and faces. He never says the word "Jewish," but I think the anti-Semitic theme is there. We receive long lectures about how capitalism is inconsistent with Christianity, followed a heavy-handed array of — it's up to you to see that they are — Jewish villains."
http://althouse.blogspot.com/2009/10/some-thoughts-on-seeing-capitalism-love.html
Hadn't seen that review.
Post a Comment