For years Lorrie McNeill loved teaching “To Kill a Mockingbird,” the Harper Lee classic that many Americans regard as a literary rite of passage.
Great book.
But last fall, for the first time in 15 years, Ms. McNeill, 42, did not assign “Mockingbird” — or any novel. Instead she turned over all the decisions about which books to read to the students in her seventh- and eighth-grade English classes at Jonesboro Middle School in this south Atlanta suburb.
Right. Let the students decide what they should learn. As if reading anything is fine as long as you are reading.
Critics of the approach say that reading as a group generally leads to more meaningful insights, and they question whether teachers can really keep up with a roomful of children reading different books. Even more important, they say, is the loss of a common body of knowledge based on the literary classics — often difficult books that children are unlikely to choose for themselves.
Bingo.

1 comments:
Questions:
the loss of a common body of knowledge based on the literary classics —
What exactly is that common body of knowledge that we all share from reading classics in high school?
What part of that knowlege could not be replaced by just seeing the movies?
Post a Comment